The Hidden Impact of Poor IT Onboarding and Offboarding on Productivity and Risk

Most businesses think onboarding and offboarding are administrative events.

They’re not.

They are identity control events.

Every time someone joins, changes role, or leaves, your systems either reflect that change cleanly — or they don’t. When they don’t, the symptoms aren’t dramatic. They’re operational:

• Delayed access
• Over-permissioned accounts
• Manual workarounds
• Unclear data ownership
• Managers chasing IT

Over time, this becomes friction baked into the business.

For HR and Operations leaders, that’s not an IT inconvenience. It’s a structural inefficiency.

‍

The Productivity Impact No One Puts in a Report

If a new employee spends their first week waiting for access, asking colleagues to forward documents, or sitting outside key Teams channels, productivity has already dropped.

In environments built on Microsoft 365, identity governs everything:

• Teams membership
• SharePoint libraries
• Email permissions
• Conditional access policies
• MFA enforcement
• Device compliance

When onboarding is reactive, access is granted manually. When it’s manual, it’s inconsistent. When it’s inconsistent, managers compensate with workarounds.

That compensation is where the real cost sits.

Not in IT tickets.
In lost momentum.

‍

Offboarding Is Where Risk Quietly Accumulates

Onboarding exposes inefficiency.

Offboarding exposes governance.

Accounts left active for “a few days.”
Shared mailboxes never reviewed.
Project folders still accessible.
Third-party app access forgotten.

Inside Microsoft Entra ID, identity is the control layer. If deprovisioning isn’t structured, permissions don’t disappear on their own.

The Australian Signals Directorate (Cyber Security Centre) highlights access control and privilege management as core elements of the Essential Eight.

But beyond compliance, the issue is operational clarity.

When someone leaves, the business should know:

• Who now owns their data
• What systems they accessed
• What licences can be reallocated
• Whether privileged roles were removed

If that requires guesswork, the process isn’t mature.

‍

The Real Problem: Identity Is Treated as a Setup Task

Most businesses have the right tools.

They already use Microsoft Teams, SharePoint, Outlook, OneDrive. They have MFA enabled. They have licences assigned.

What they often don’t have is role-based identity design.

Instead of access being tied to job function, it’s tied to individual memory:

“Can you add Sarah to that folder?”
“Can you give Tom the same access as John?”
“Can you remove Mark’s admin rights?”

Over time, permissions accumulate. They rarely reduce cleanly.

That is not a technology limitation. It is an identity design gap.

Microsoft’s own identity documentation outlines how Entra ID is designed to centralise authentication, policy enforcement, and access governance:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/fundamentals/what-is-entra

The capability exists. The structure often doesn’t.

‍

Clear Example: Same Tools, Different Outcomes

Two businesses both use Microsoft 365.

Business A

• Access granted manually
• No defined role templates
• Offboarding checklist lives in someone’s inbox
• No scheduled access reviews

Result: friction, over-permissioning, reactive clean-up.

Business B

• Role-based security groups
• HR-triggered onboarding workflow
• Automated licence allocation
• Documented deprovisioning sequence
• Periodic access reviews

Result: predictable access, faster onboarding, cleaner offboarding, fewer surprises.

The difference is not spend.
It’s operational maturity.

‍

Why This Matters to HR and Operations

HR owns the employee lifecycle.
Operations owns business efficiency.
IT owns identity infrastructure.

When those three aren’t aligned, onboarding becomes slower than necessary and offboarding becomes uncertain.

When aligned, businesses gain:

• Faster time to productivity
• Clearer accountability for access decisions
• Cleaner audit readiness
• Reduced reliance on institutional memory
• Better use of Microsoft 365 licensing

This is particularly important in growing businesses where headcount changes frequently. Identity debt scales quickly if it isn’t structured early.

‍

The Strategic Question to Ask

Most businesses ask:

“Are accounts created and removed?”

The better question is:

“Is our identity model designed around how our business operates?”

That means:

• Defined role profiles
• Access mapped to job function
• Standardised Microsoft 365 licence bundles
• Formal HR → IT triggers
• Clear ownership transfer at offboarding
• Access reviews as policy, not reaction

Without that, productivity drag and access exposure remain ongoing operational costs.

‍

How Superior IT Supports Well-Run Microsoft 365 Environments

At Superior IT, we help businesses move from simply using Microsoft 365 to operating it properly.

Onboarding and offboarding are not isolated IT tasks. They sit within a broader identity structure that determines how access is granted, reviewed, and removed over time.

Our focus is practical and operational.

That means reviewing how identity is currently structured, how licences are allocated, how access aligns to job roles, and whether lifecycle processes are documented and consistently followed. It also means ensuring that identity settings, security controls, and access governance are maintained as the business evolves — not just configured once and forgotten.

For HR and Operations leaders, this provides clarity:

• Are new starters productive on day one?
• Is access aligned to role, not memory?
• Are permissions reviewed periodically?
• Does offboarding reliably remove access and reassign ownership?

If you want a clearer view of your current Microsoft 365 setup, identity structure, licensing allocation, or access processes, our team can help.

Phone: 1300 93 77 49
Email: info@superiorit.com.au